![]() |
| Photo Credit - MRCC |
At just over 21 metres tall, it is one of those landmarks that forms part of the Red Cliffs History. Whether you are heading through town, visiting the market, driving past on an ordinary day, or coming home after being away, the tower is just there, a familiar part of the place.
Now, Lower Murray Water is proposing to lower its height.
The tower is now 100 years old, and Lower Murray Water says the proposal is aimed at preserving the look of the tower, including the current mural, while also addressing public safety concerns. The concern is that parts of the site could crack and fall from a significant height if action is not taken.
From early 2027, the tower will no longer hold water. A new pumping system will instead provide increased urban water pressure to Red Cliffs, with stabilised sand proposed to be placed inside the tower. The ladder on the side of the tower would also be removed to prevent people climbing on it.
But for many locals, this is about more than water pressure and engineering.
It raises a bigger question.
Could the Red Cliffs Water Tower be restored?
If the tower is no longer needed to hold water, does that open the door to a different future for it? Could it be made safe, protected, and turned into a proper public art and history piece for the town?
Across the Mallee, old working structures have found new life through art. The silo art trail has shown how something built for industry and practicality can become something people travel to see.
Rainbow is a good example of that. Its silo art does not just sit on the outside. It also uses internal space as part of the visitor experience, creating something that is both artwork and attraction.
So could Red Cliffs look at something similar?
If the tower is going to be empty, could it house art externally and internally? Could the current mural be preserved and built on? Could the inside become a small interpretive space, telling the story of Red Cliffs, the irrigation settlement, soldier settlers, dried fruit, water infrastructure and the people who built the town?
It might sound ambitious, but Red Cliffs already has the hardest part — a landmark with history, location and community connection.
That is what makes this proposal feel like a fork in the road.
On one hand, Red Cliffs could lose part of a 100-year-old structure from its skyline.
On the other, if handled carefully, the town could keep the tower’s story alive and maybe even turn it into something bigger... a visitor stop, a local art piece and a reminder of how important water has been to the district.
Of course, public safety has to come first. No one wants an old structure becoming dangerous. But safety and imagination do not have to be enemies.
If the tower has to change, the question becomes how much of its history can be saved — and whether that change could become an opportunity rather than just a loss.
Lower Murray Water says hundreds of people provided feedback at the Red Cliffs Country Markets over the King’s Birthday weekend, and community members can still read more and provide questions or comments through its Your Say page.
That feedback matters, because this is one of those decisions that goes beyond concrete, ladders and pumps.
It is about what a town keeps.
It is about what a town loses.
And maybe, if Red Cliffs pushes for the right outcome, it is also about what a town can turn into something new.
The Red Cliffs Water Tower may no longer be needed to hold water from 2027, but that does not mean its story has to run dry.
